Pre-investment decision-grade evidence for major capex programmes.
Before you commit ₹50 Cr to a new line, ₹100 Cr to a new caster, or $20M to a new STS crane · simulate it. Throughput uplift, payback period, sensitivity to demand. Decision-grade evidence for the board, not a pitch deck of vendor claims.
Every capex pitch comes with throughput claims. The new machine does 120 units/hour · so the line throughput goes up 25%, right? Wrong half the time. The new machine starves on inadequate upstream supply, or blocks on inadequate downstream buffer, or hits a different bottleneck that the throughput uplift exposes. The vendor's number is a machine capability, not a system outcome. Discrete event simulation gives you the system outcome · how much throughput will you actually realise from this capex, in your line, under your product mix, with your operating constraints? Used by every F500 plant in our roster for capex committee evidence.
CEng MIE India-signed deliverables · LiDAR-powered where applicable · digital twin handover ready · routes to the Discrete Event Simulation practice lead within 24 hours.
Current line modelled and validated to historical throughput within tight tolerance.
Each capex alternative encoded · the new equipment, modified routings, expanded buffers, automated handling, whatever the capex case proposes.
Each scenario run to compute realistic throughput uplift · not vendor-claim, but in-context simulation result.
What if demand grows / falls? What if product mix shifts? What if reliability is below vendor claim? Throughput uplift bounded under realistic uncertainty.
Capex + operating cost + throughput value tabulated. Payback, NPV, IRR computed. Board-ready evidence pack. CEng MIE-signed.
Reports reference the international and national standards your regulators, F500 audit teams, and corporate process safety leads cite. Every deliverable signed by a Chartered Engineer (CEng MIE India).
Three anonymised engagements from our verified roster · quantified outcomes, no client names disclosed without written permission.
Simulated throughput uplift = 18% vs vendor-claimed 30%. Capex case rejected → savings of ₹85 Cr deferred until upstream EAF programme also funded.
Simulated 9% TEU/hr uplift vs claimed 15%. Capex deferred 12 months pending RTG bottleneck resolution. $14M saved short-term.
Simulated 22% line throughput uplift validated vendor claim. Capex committee approved with confidence.
Tell us your plant, region, and scope · a named Chartered Engineer responds within 24 hours.